On Rich Girl, neo-soul veteran Angie Stone delivers a consistent, good album that never quite reaches the status of a great album.
Angie Stone – the direct pipeline forĀ Gladys Knight, given her deep, rich alto āĀ has lost some of her luster.Ā Why? The neo-soul movement really doesn’t exist no mo. Ā Here latest album, Rich GirlĀ is good, not great. To say it’s not vintage Stone would be an understatement, but to say sheās on autopilot would be an overstatement. Ā Nonetheless, Rich GirlĀ features solid neo-soul production with lush sounds, lazy bass lines, rich background vocals, and of course Stone’s alto.
1st Tier: The Highlights
“Do What You Gotta Do,ā the second track on Rich Girl, didnāt initially blow me away as a single. Nonetheless, itās more likable on the album in context.Ā It makes nice use of supporting background vocals that complement Stone’s lead. āDo What You Gotta Doā uses typical old school, neo-soul production.
āBackup Plan,ā the third track on Rich Girl, clings to old-school sensibility. It sounds like itās native to the 1970s.Ā The production creates this sensibility: dusty drum programming, soul-funk guitars, and keyboards. Once more, Stone delivers solid vocals, with solid supporting vocals
āGuilty,ā the sixth track, delivers excellent balladry from Stone.Ā Her nuances and ad libs shine. A bit slow and drawn out, in the same respect, itās relaxed and respectably paced. Production work with gospel-soul sensibility ā particularly a big fat bass line ā helps it to stand out.
Title track āRich Girl,āĀ the ninth track, is arguably the best. This is the most suitable cut for Stone, complemented by the backing vocals allowing for her to successfully ad lib.Ā This still isnāt flashy, but gets the job done without pulling out all the stops and whistles.
2nd Tier: The Good
āRight in Front of Me,ā the 10th track, features anĀ excellent soul groove. Again, itās not flashy, but solid and consistent. It has a spark, but not the spark of the aforementioned highlights. Ultimately, āRight in Front of Meā could use more “oomph” to make it more distinct.
“U Lit My Fire,ā the 14th track, also features a fine soul groove. Stone’s vocals are a bit casual on the verse, needing more oomph. Boding well in its favor is an excellent chorus:
āThe first time that I met you baby… you lit my fire/ You lit my fireā¦ā
āSisters,ā the 15th track, comes off a bit schmaltzy. Still, everyone enjoys a good sista anthem, right? The adult contemporary R&B production is solid ā NOT FLASHY. The chorus and vocals by Stone are selling points. āSistersā closes the album well.
Final Thoughts
Pros: Stone’s rich vocals easily ride above the production work. While the production workĀ isnāt flashy, itās consistent with the neo-soul palette. In regards to songwriting, Rich Girl features solid, non-flashy cuts that suit Stone’s old-school sensibility.
Cons: The songwriting is more pro than not, but thereās nothing that bites here. Itās consistent enough with some standouts, but not flashy. In regards to excitability, nothing makes you jump up and want to dance or even sing-along. Rich Girl, hence, isnāt an exciting album. Even the cover fails to suggest an exhilarating ride; conservative.Ā While the album is only 50 minutes in duration, 40 minutes wouldāve been sufficient.
Verdict: All in all, Rich Girl is solid,Ā soulful and consistent for the most part. Ā This isnāt an album for a long road trip.
Gems: āDo What You Gotta Do,ā āBackup Plan,ā āGuiltyā & āRich Girlā
